Largely agree. “coloured underbelly” doesn’t sound logical, wouldn’t it imply other parts of the body are uncolored, or greyscale? “contrasting underbelly” would probably catch what you mean and be clearer.
Yep, I agree completely with this point. That’s what “proposal 10” would accomplish.
Also related is the tag
countershading which has a particular definition but is getting misused a little, and might not need to remain separate from a generic “different color belly from elsewhere” tag.
Ooh, very interesting.
TIL this is an actual anatomical term! And “reverse countershading” is apparently its opposite. These two would be a better “master tag” for what they apply to IMO and should be part of this proposal set.
I’d amend my original proposals as follows:
-
-
Since starting this thread, I also learned that tag implications apparently don’t cascade so all the transitive implications of the proposal set will need to be set up as well.
There’s one more detail which isn’t quite accounted for right now: some characters have their entire undersides in a different color, including both their necks and torsos, while it’s only one or the other for others.
Misty, for example, has a contrasting torso but not neck:
I would find these worth differentiating somehow because they do significantly affect a character’s appearance. But I need to think a bit more about what a sensible way to do that might be - suggestions are welcome.
Regardless, I didn’t find any existing “tagging patterns” that differentiate these three cases anyway so I believe this thread’s proposals can still be implemented as-is without losing information that would help identify them retroactively.