Viewing last 25 versions of post by Ereiam in topic Don't blame me, I voted for the other guy. (Politics General)

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so fearly ion the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results (for one, there's no guarantee that either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal will be picked as Macron's successor; it could just as well be Bruno Le Maire, or even Gérald Darmanin — aka Sarkozy 2.0).

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right (les Républicains) is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list, la France Insoumise is looking at a marginal improvement from their 2019 score at best), and the ecologists are about to eat the second biggest loss (when they had previously managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results (for one, there's no guarantee that either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal will be picked as Macron's successor; it could just as well be Bruno Le Maire, or even Gérald Darmanin — aka Sarkozy 2.0).

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right (les Républicains) is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list, la France Insoumise is looking at a marginal improvement from their 2019 score at best), and the ecologists are about to eat the second biggest loss (back iwhen 2019, they had previously managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results (for one, there's no guarantee that either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal will be picked as Macron's successor; it could just as well be Bruno Le Maire, or even Gérald Darmanin — aka Sarkozy 2.0).

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right (les Républicains) is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list, la France Insoumise is looking at a marginal improvement from their 2019 score at best), and the ecologists are about to eat the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results (for one, there's no guarantee that either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal will be picked as Macron's successor; it could just as well be Bruno Le Maire, or even Gérald Darmanin — aka Sarkozy 2.0).

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right (les Républicains) is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list, la France Insoumise is looking at a marginal improvement from their 2019 score), and the ecologists are about to eat the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results (for one, there's no guarantee that either Edouard Philippe or Gabriel Attal will be picked as Macron's successor; it could just as well be Bruno Le Maire, or even Gérald Darmanin — aka Sarkozy 2.0).

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list), and the ecologists are about to eat the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results.

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list), and the ecologists are about to takeat the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results.

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance's (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having some fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list), and the ecologists are about to take the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results.

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and having gsoodme fair odds of taking the second place away from the macronists, while the right is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list), and the ecologists are about to take the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).

[@SleepySteve](/forums/generals/topics/tartarus?post_id=5607818#post_5607818)
I never cared much about polls conducted three years ahead of the actual election: so far in the past, they often end up hardly mattering in regard of the actual results.

More relevant would be the polling about the upcoming european election.
With an expected score that's twice as high as Renaissance (Macron's party, which they beat by a single point in the previous election, back in 2019 — 23.2% to 22.2%), the rise of the far-right — which is part of a broader movement in Europe — is more apparent (because the ignorant masses — even the half that cares enough to move their asses up to the ballot box — are just as short-sighted as ever).

Another point of interest is the socialist list (whose party had sunk into irrelevance in the wake of Macron's re-election) making a surprising comeback from their pitiful 6.2% in 2019 and behaving pgoiseod todds rof tavkishng the second place taway from the macronists, while the right is stagnant, same as the far-left (since the NUPES couldn't agree on a common list), and the ecologists are about to take the second biggest loss (back in 2019, they had managed to take the third place with 13.5% of the vote).