@CaptainXtra
Empires don’t really collapse they shrink and change forms,
This is wildly ahistoric. It’s kinda funny.
Care to elaborate?
There were a number of former empires that collapsed and left nothing left, or very little left. Nothing that you’d call enough of a remnant to change and morph into something new. The empires of the ancient world were regularly obliterated from the world when their times were up; Babylon, Assyria, Athens (Dalian League), Rome, Cham Empire, Aztecs, Mayans, and so on.
Even later modern empires collapse and entirely disappear, but not as gloriously as the priests of Babylon being crushed by the statues of their own gods at the hands and winches of the victorious Assyrian or melted into ignominy. Simply put: the modern empire exists as not just a political entity but as an economic entity. The collapse of the modern empire is the replacement of one nation’s economic sphere with that of another. The Dutch and Portuguese, once pillars of European colonial imperialism are entirely gone; the Portuguese in fact collapsed so hard they are an accessory to French imperialism in West Africa, deploying troops solely to support French or NATO interests (if the former Yugoslavia).
The condition of empire necessarily is dependent on the relative phase of human history it is. During the times of post-tribal slave society the Empire was a strict domination of other societies and would itself be subsumed by other societies and subjugated as slaves to them. And then when the slave state was supplanted by the feudal state and Empire was merely the rule of a family (the Carolingians come to mind) and so on unto the liberal democracies and their markets today and their economic components - direct or indirect as they are - and they shall have their own falls and collapses from the world stage as the bitter and violent ends of the Cham, Egyptians, Romans, and the Elamites.