Tag Implications

In light of barbeque’s post, and the few times I’ve had to explain the change and its problems, I’ll bump a post I made here a month ago.

@Vercci

@dt

pony on human action -> human on pony action

I think you were a little too quick to add this one to the implications. Before this post, ‘pony on human action’ was mostly used for sexual images between a male stallion and a human female (More accurately, pony penis and human vagina).

Compared to the 2000+ images found for ‘human on pony action’, there were less than 200 for ‘pony on human action’, although recent uploads for ‘pony on human action’ have been tainted by the implication already. It should be undone.

tl;dr ‘human on pony action’ and ‘pony on human action’ should NOT imply each other.

And to expand slightly, the two tags garner two different audiences that are interested in different things. By far, the majority of people have been interested in putting penis inside their best pone. Nowhere near as much people want pone penis inside ‘us’.

I also forgot to think about gays at the time of the original post.‘human on pony action’ is more accurately used with human penis inside a pony, and ‘pony on human action’ is again pony pen0r inside human booty, in one form or another. If there’s no obvious penetration, the more dominant “human” or “pony” gets to have the tag instead. And for that magic case of a human and a pony managing to penetrate each other at the same time, that’d be a legitimate case of both tags on the same image.

And no, I never thought I’d have to ever gratuitously describe any of this.

teats(http://derpiboo.ru/tags/teats) should imply crotchboobs(http://derpiboo.ru/tags/crotchboobs), but not vice versa.