Maonyman 
I wanna go to Equestria
[@Background Pony \#32C7](/forums/tagging/topics/can-we-please-do-something-about-solo-pics-with-multiple-characters?post_id=5541079#post_5541079)
> Unfortunately, this would fail (without further work to create an exception list) because some characters get multiple character-categorized tags applied in tandem: for example, golden harvest/carrot top, or sci-twi/twilight sparkle
There's few enough of those that they can be easily added as exceptions to the check
> It also fails in the case when other characters are depicted but not present - for example, a picture of Twilight Sparkle with a photo of the mane six displayed on the wall could get all of the character tags, but be a “solo” picture because only Twi is actually there.
This is exactly the kind of scenario I *want* it to apply to. If I search for "pinkie pie, solo" I do NOT want to get a picture that is clearly of Twilight and only Twilight but which happens to have a tiny picture of Pinkie in the corner of the image.
[@LightningBolt](/forums/tagging/topics/can-we-please-do-something-about-solo-pics-with-multiple-characters?post_id=5541091#post_5541091)
> Plus OC tags or nameless characters or random depictions of animals that are not named.
Why would this change anything? OCs should be subject to the same rule (if I don't want a picture of Twilight with a tiny picture of Pinkie in the corner, I *definitely* do not want some random-ass OC with a tiny picture of Pinkie in the corner), and random depictions of unnamed animals aren't character tags so wouldn't trigger the check anyway.
> Unfortunately, this would fail (without further work to create an exception list) because some characters get multiple character-categorized tags applied in tandem: for example, golden harvest/carrot top, or sci-twi/twilight sparkle
There's few enough of those that they can be easily added as exceptions to the check
> It also fails in the case when other characters are depicted but not present - for example, a picture of Twilight Sparkle with a photo of the mane six displayed on the wall could get all of the character tags, but be a “solo” picture because only Twi is actually there.
This is exactly the kind of scenario I *want* it to apply to. If I search for "pinkie pie, solo" I do NOT want to get a picture that is clearly of Twilight and only Twilight but which happens to have a tiny picture of Pinkie in the corner of the image.
[@LightningBolt](/forums/tagging/topics/can-we-please-do-something-about-solo-pics-with-multiple-characters?post_id=5541091#post_5541091)
> Plus OC tags or nameless characters or random depictions of animals that are not named.
Why would this change anything? OCs should be subject to the same rule (if I don't want a picture of Twilight with a tiny picture of Pinkie in the corner, I *definitely* do not want some random-ass OC with a tiny picture of Pinkie in the corner), and random depictions of unnamed animals aren't character tags so wouldn't trigger the check anyway.