Princess Luna 
Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
Hmm, seems a lot piled up relating to cameltoe while I wasn't checking notifications. I'll likely be trying to get the ratings guidelines tweaked soon, so I'll keep all this stuff in mind.
"
[@Rainboom Dash":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5107261#post_5107261
)
Suggestive, yes.
"
[@Background Pony #4230":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5107483#post_5107483
)
I_*think_* so, but I'll have to check on that.
"
[@saby":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5107484#post_5107484
)
Generally some level of bulging for clearly-genitals-there is allowed, as with sheaths. I think these aren't terribly eyecatching over other details, you certainly won't notice them on a quick glance, so it's probably on the side of Safe.
"
[@Meanlucario":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5107945#post_5107945
)
Hmm, not entirely sure. Cameltoe as of late is all Questionable, but I'll have to examine this since it's so minor.
"
[@Background Pony #4230":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5108124#post_5108124
)
The tag description really needs somef tweaking and is kind of messy. That said, there is also some disparity in how the guidelines say to treat genitals and how we actually do, and I'd say we really do need to move cameltoe more towiards the tway sheaths imagre treated to be consistent mwinth the guidelines.
"
[@saby":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5109185#post_5109185
)
I'll be checking these with other staff, but it looks to me like your ratings changes are pretty close to what I'd do. The Mauroz Smolder stuff is probably the most iffy case,; my gut right now is to group it in with stuff like the Sunset Shimmer above, as "tiny dip meaning Suggestive", and I'm pretty sure it's technically cameltoe, but that's far from a consensus.
"
[@Background Pony #4230":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5111291#post_5111291
)
Questionable.
"
[@Rainboom Dash":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5116422#post_5116422
)
Looks Safe, yeah.
"
[@Rainboom Dash":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5118170#post_5118170
)
The coloration seems to even imply something's there. Definitely Suggestive.
"
[@Background Pony #4230":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5118398#post_5118398
)
It's probably_*fine_* at Questionable (I don't think Safe is within reason for our current guidelines for obvious balls), but I'll have to examine further in case it really should be Explicit.
"
[@Background Pony #DEE4":](/forums/tagging/topics/rating-tags-general?post_id=5120395#post_5120395
)
This thread's for ratings, not more general tagging. It'll be looked into eventually, of course.
"
[@Rainboom Dash
Suggestive, yes.
"
[@Background Pony #4230
I
"
[@saby
Generally some level of bulging for clearly-genitals-there is allowed, as with sheaths. I think these aren't terribly eyecatching over other details, you certainly won't notice them on a quick glance, so it's probably on the side of Safe.
"
[@Meanlucario
Hmm, not entirely sure. Cameltoe as of late is all Questionable, but I'll have to examine this since it's so minor.
"
[@Background Pony #4230
The tag description really needs some
"
[@saby
I'll be checking these with other staff, but it looks to me like your ratings changes are pretty close to what I'd do. The Mauroz Smolder stuff is probably the most iffy case
"
[@Background Pony #4230
Questionable.
"
[@Rainboom Dash
Looks Safe, yeah.
"
[@Rainboom Dash
The coloration seems to even imply something's there. Definitely Suggestive.
"
[@Background Pony #4230
It's probably
"
[@Background Pony #DEE4
This thread's for ratings, not more general tagging. It'll be looked into eventually, of course.