@[Ω]
Some are, but by definition a “troll” is usually a faker just trying to get attention. Ian’s/Archie’s/IDW’s hatedom is so dedicated to their hate, (and spreading false information about them) that I don’t think they’re faking. These haters really seem to believe their own B.S. and put alot of effort into it. One guy on DA even puts up lots of links/research, (misinterpreted research) into his claims against Ian, IDW, ect. too.
As a Sally/SatA.M. fan, it also saddens me that the Sally/SatA.M. fandom has turned against Ian blaming him for why Sally isn’t in the comic, (not understanding a writer can’t “do whatever he wants”) and such, even though Ian said he’d like to bring back the SatA.M. characters, and stuff. Ironically, some are even siding with Ken Penders. I saw one even claim, “Ken had more respect for SatA.M. then Ian.” Which pissed me off, because Ken’s later issues were hardly related to SatA.M., not to mention, he wanted to kill off Sally & Robotnik, (two key SatA.M./comic characters) and on top of that Ken BACKSTABBED Ben Hurst, and his pitch for a SatA.M. third season/finale video movie, because Ken wanted to make his own “Sonic but he’s in space now” movie. (Which was rejected. Karma.) So Ken basically killed any chance for a SatA.M. revival.
Sorry, to rant a bit, lol I’m not trying to mindlessly hate on Ken, (as I said I like his stories, but still think he’s a jerk.) but seeing SatA.M. fans say that, or blindly side with him is ironic.
Not to mention, unlike Ken, Ian Flynn actually is a SatA.M. fan, referenced it in some of his issues, (including the obscure “MARGERINE” joke/meme that only a SatA.M. viewer would know) and as I said before, ironically Ian used to get hate from anti-SatA.M./anti-Sally fans for using those features in the Archie Sonic comic series.
(Boy, did that reverse quckly, eh?)
@[Ω]
Nice, though the OVA was actually late-’90s.