[NSFW] Why is anatomically correct = horsecunt?

Shouldn’t anatomically correct be implied by two separate tags — those being horsecock and horsecunt?
 
Why is it the way it is now?

I have no idea, honestly, I guess because horsecunt isn’t a nice thing to say. Then again, we have cuntboy just fine, so who knows. :v

since anatomically correct is nicer and horsecunt never caught on like cuntboy. We could prob alias it to like, vagboy, but the chance that would catch on probably hit 0% before this site even existed.

Then why not at least have it implied by horsecock?

@asdfghjkl  
since it’s more just become horsecunt rather than actually anatomically correct. I believe the description for it even says it’s basically the female equivalent of horsecock. At this point, usage has basically dictated that that’s what the tag is.
 
(It’d be possible to unalias it and do horse vag or something, that wouldn’t really be the problem. Users following it would.)

@Rdobet  
Yeah, I guess you’re right.

@Rdobet  
the way he’s defining ‘horsecunt’ has nothing to do with the concept of cuntboys haha.
 
also more on topic, but using ‘cunt’ in that way in such a highly used tag is kinda gross. ‘cuntboy’ has been a fetish term for a while and it’s used for a very specific fetish, but tagging all horse pussy with ‘horsecunt’ just doesn’t seem right imo. like, do you call every vagina you see a cunt? no. you use ‘cunt’ as an insult almost every time you use it.
 
if ‘anatomically correct’ was to change (which i wouldn’t mind tbh), i think something like ‘horse genitalia’ would be good, or if you want to stay specifically female, go with ‘horse vulva’.

@pearlyiridescence  
Nono, cuntboy was brought up since cunt is generally considered an offensive term. inb4 ’Straya
 
Funnily enough, you just reiterated that point anyway.

@Rdobet  
ah ok i see. sorry i wasn’t entirely following the flow of that conversation haha.

Because other r34 sites uses this tag to describe animal genitals. Dp just adopted it.

@Splinter  
well, i learned something new.

@asdfghjkl
 
Yeah, it was more meant to be anatomically correct for the animal when used in furry forums. As opposed to putting human genitals on an anthro or feral character. Sure, it should be implied for horsecock as well, but I’ve not really seen as much complaints about horsecock as I have about horsepussy. People seem to get really upset on the horse vs. human pussy issue, and not as much on the cock.
 
Also, horse pussy is basically a joke tag at this point.
 

 
I just don’t like horse cunt. I’m not a fan of cuntboy either, but I’ve never heard a better name catch on for that particular kink.

@Masque Raccoon  

I get pretty damn frustrated with anatomically incorrect horsecocks too. But that seems to be more of a “me” thing rather than a general thing.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone complain about a pony having a horsecock, and the amount of ponies with human cocks is so rare, I can only recall one image.
 
Edit: This is a furry thing too, animal versus human cocks can go either way, but human vaginas tend to be much more common than animal vaginas.

@Background Pony #8C25  
Nah, they annoy me too. Most are just a tube with a ring. Even if they don’t make simple mistakes like that, very few ever actually get the details on flares and changes in girth right.
 
Same goes for anatomically correct though in that half the time it just means they did a vaguely teardrop shape instead of like, a knife wound that many seem to draw.

@Rdobet  
At least I’m not alone in feeling that way.  
Getting either genital set wrong