Rating tags general

@Rainboom Dash
I think they’re suggestive cos they’re “foot fetish” pictures.

@Blissful690
I realize that but… especially the image of the leg and foot.. idk…
I guess it’s because the breezies are supposed to be crushed.. but you don’t see that.. and ratings are done by one image at at a time

I also don’t think it’s a detailed foot focus and shouldn’t be labeled suggestive due to that…

soooo

@Background Pony #4230
A little too on the nose to be Safe.

@Rainboom Dash
Focusing on feet isn’t enough for Suggestive without some kind of additional something to actually sexualize it.

I’m quite sure >>1399727 is mis-tagged as questionable, but should it be suggestive or safe?

Just a question…

Is a pony receiving a prostate exam (Aka getting a hoof on their butt) explicit, questionable or suggestive? I kinda wanted to parody a famous scene of a comedy TV show.

@Background Pony #4230
I think Safe. It’s a little too vague for Suggestive.

@Background Pony #81B2
Short of something changing context or certain details, Safe, as seen with >>842483.

nevermind, figured it out

>>2689518
Is this really safe, or should it be bumped up to suggestive?

@Blissful690
I’d say it’s safe, because the show had this:

Yeah, but then you have to take shipping into account.

@Blissful690
I’m thinking Suggestive.

@Background Pony #4230
Putting the tip of the nose against it like that and the blush rather push things further than Pinkie’s cheek-to-cheek hug.

I think this >>2836889 would be suggestive - certainly not explicit like it is now - but I’m not positive that it’s not questionable.

@Background Pony #4230
Yes.

I feel like this is more Suggestive than Questionable.

This is not explicit, but I’m not quite sure which is the proper rating, given the context.

@Hopen Way
Safe, there’s nothing to indicate they are blushing for non-innocent reasons or that anything is going on on the other side.

@Meanlucario
Yes, breast nudity without nipples is “suggestive” and there’s nothing in the picture that would warrant a higher rating.

@saby
Thank you.

Is there anything in this image that constitutes it being explicit? Should it be lowered?

@Blissful690
She’s masturbating there, and sex acts get a picture automatically rated explicit, even if the act itself (or the character’s genitals) isn’t visible.

@Blissful690
The hoof having motion lines while so clearly on the crotch is really pushing things, so while the guidelines are a little out of step with actual practice on when to rate Explicit (guidelines being slightly too strict about stuff we can’t actually see), it’s very likely this image would remain Explicit after a tweak to them.

I’m pretty sure >>2847004 isn’t “questionable” (although I didn’t zoom in to look for any tiny slips) but not sure if it’d be “suggestive” or “safe”

But do the spike and crow badges count only the number of images changed?

For example a user who adds 50 tags in 30 images and a user who adds 50 tags in 10 images are different?

(I mean tags in total)

@Background Pony #87FF, @Background Pony #87FF
I think you’ve posted to the wrong thread. This thread is for questions about image rating tags. You might be looking for the thread about site badges
The answer to your question, though, is that it’s counted per tag that’s added or removed. You can see how your “Metadata Updates” value goes up on your account profile and how the list of your tag changes is one at a time.