Posts

There’s something wonky going on with tag saving. Basically 75% of the time saving tags results in an error that looks like this:

This error message replaces the tag editor, but leaves the rest of the page intact. You have to reload the page and try again. The second edit attempt seems to always succeed. This means you have to do almost all tag edits twice.

I’m 99% certain cookies are enabled in my browser (FF 125.0.3), otherwise I wouldn’t stay logged in.

This didn’t happen around 8-9 hours ago.

EDIT: Whatever caused this, it appears to have gone away. Let’s hope it stays away.

@Soobel, @The Smiling Pony
More specifically, links to files on Discord work for a short amount of time and then expire. You’d have to constantly edit the post with updated links.

@Soobel
Discord blocked hotlinking about a year ago, shortly after imgur.

Mods will move this question to proper place if i write in wrong topic…
Im noticed my pictures disappear in art topics (“Show off your art” for example)
While editing the post i see the link standing there but not works any more.
Most recent time the pic was linked from Discord server. Does Discord bolcked here or they change picture’s data on server and just broke link from there?
Now i linked pic to Derpibooru’s source and it working again.

@Princess Celestia
It worked! Thank you, Celestia!

@Princess Celestia
I love you so much! I’ll test it later

@Background Pony #C7BB
Try now, I just deployed an update (as in, literally minutes ago) with different bundler settings to target some 2018 browsers. It claims that safari 12 is supported, but mobile support might be more dodgy.

@Princess Celestia
Any chance you could get derpibooru to support outdated software.
I have an iPod touch from 2018 running IOS 12.5.7
I can get on the website, but images are blank and I can’t upload, comment

@Princess Celestia
UPDATE: I have tested Chromium (Chrome) versions 67, 87, 84, 80 and 79 to determine the lowest-possible version where the JS doesn’t break. The results:

Chrome 84 (mid-2020) and 87 (late 2020) and newer = everything works perfectly, no errors in JS, no visual bugs
Chrome 80 (early 2020) = no errors in JS and normal site displays fine, but redesign layout is a bit derped as it uses some newer CSS features like gap in flexboxes
Chrome 79 and 67 = JS errors, site doesn’t work or load properly

@Aurora Glide
Heya! You appear to be using an old browser version, according to what I can see in our server logs. Would you be so kind as to inform us of the exact OS version and browser version you’re using so we can investigate why things aren’t working? Your browser theoretically should be supported in production deployment (definitely isn’t supported in development mode deployment), so I wanna find out why it isn’t and if I can do anything to help it.

In the meantime, try to find a browser that’s a bit more modern (anything released in 2020 and beyond will be guaranteed to work), to alleviate your immediate issue while we determine whether we can fix your older browser’s support of the site.

@Aurora Glide
Are you by chance using a very old version of Android?

@Aurora Glide
Apart from the pics refusing to load and even that being rather rare, never had it nearly as bad as you describe.

^ Try opening the dev tools panel (F12 on non-Mac systems on Chrome/Chromium and probly Firefox), open the console tab, check the settings in that tab that it’ll show all messages, then force refreshing the page without a cache (CTRL-F5 on non-Mac systems). That should give you a little more info on what’s wrong.

For more than a day now, several site functions have not been working for me, on several browsers.
These include:

Basically, everything involving javascript, I think.

However, javascript is on, and does work on other websites. Nothing is blocked by any sort of filter. Also, the site doesn’t give me the “no javascript” warning.

And now works. Magic.

Something with previews…

@Princess Celestia
Did they elaborate why they’d unban even if you appeal ? Sounds like they did it to see if anyone would give a fuck, cuz knowing the Russian govt …

Following up from here, because it’s going off-topic on a tangent.

There are some more undocumented search fields:
pixels (numeric)
size (numeric, bytes)
animated (boolean)
duration (numeric, seconds)
first_seen_at (date/time)
updated_at (date/time)
file_name (literal)

And then a couple that most people would never need:
processed (boolean) surprisingly, there are a few dozen old unprocessed posts
thumbnails_generated (boolean)

@uis
This has been resolved and I was informed by roskom that we’re unbanned.

Got unbanned. Still want to see what was too hot for putin. Nevermind, I think I found. Lol.

@Modera
Quite possible. Otherwise call it not hot enough for putin.

@uis
well, if he got fetish for swastika and nazi uniform, maybe it’s hot..

New image with too hot for putin tag?

@Silver Midnight
Went and checked myself. https://reestr.rublacklist.net/ru/record/6960314/ Yep. Banned.
Roscomsvoboda is trusted source. And I can confirm derpicdn does not work in Russia for a day or so.

@Ciaran

@mdashlw
well i did my part in trying to make it not blocked, i dunno if russia will listen to anything i have to say though