Posts

@Angius  
Lol, yup. Straining the definition of a MLP booru. I’m here for ponies, its that simple, heh.

Oh yeah, guess I’ll need that filter as well. I often see an image with a snail or whatever and it turns out it’s an in-universe snailsona of a humanized version of someone’s pony-like species OC…

Yup, I supposed adding that to my filters would work, I doubt there would be any pictures that aren’t non-MLP OCs that I would miss. Thanks for the tip.
 
While I do worry the “grandfathering” of non pony content that has snuck in for long enough to be exploitable I doubt it’ll lead to intentional abuse of the system.

@AwkwardLuna  
Well, like I said, this OC has images here going back to 2019, and if I deleted the image you reported I’d have to look at Rule #3ing images that have been here for years, so generally speaking we tend to “grandfather in” OCs that have a long history on the site.
 
If that was the first time the OC had been posted here, the result would have been different.
 
Anyway, for this image and OCs like it, is “OC AND Barely Pony Related” in your complex filter sufficient to filter out the content you’d like to avoid?

So recently I came across this picture >>2631570 and reported it as nonpony content. A mod explained the reasoning that it should stay, that its Pony enough, which is fine (not my rules anyways), but it does make me wonder if we need a tag more specific than “barely pony related” for those of us who want to filter these sorts of non-MLP OCs but not miss other actual pony content that may carry that tag. I’d personally rather not see non-MLP content on a MLP site, so a more specific tag could help with that.