Posts

@Background Pony #4230
Indeed.

>>3146425 uploaded as safe, seems suggestive to me?

@Background Pony #4230
Not sure about Semi-grimdark on that first one. Second definitely looks Suggestive.

A user tagged >>3107999 grimdark…I don’t think it’s even semi-grimdark. Check, please?

>>2063259 is currently safe, should it be suggestive?

@Background Pony #4230
People thinking tight spandex is Questionable and putting any rating other than Safe on something about depression. Both are Safe.

>>3138116 was uploaded as questionable. Is there something about it I’m not seeing that isn’t safe?

>>3138095 was uploaded as suggestive, is there something I don’t understand in it that isn’t safe?

@Princess Luna
I can believe that.

@Meanlucario
Swimwear rating tends to be hard for people.

Why is the first one Safe but the second Suggestive?

@Background Pony #4230
Probably just a mistake on upload.

>>3127832 was uploaded as suggestive, am I missing something about it that isn’t safe?

@Blissful690
Questionable since we neither see her genitals nor can tell she’s really doing anything with them, and her expression is fairly neutral.

>>3124723
Explicit or questionable?

@Background Pony #4230
There’s a lot of near-genital area showing, so Suggestive might be correct, but I’ll double-check with other staff.

>>3120998 presently “suggestive”, should be “safe”?

@platinumdrop
It’s certainly on the Semi-grimdark/Grimdark border, but I think the detail on the bone itself (blood-soaked and jagged) might push it over a bit. It’s at least not Grotesque.

@Background Pony #4230
I think so, though the former is more iffy.

>>2133712 is currently “suggestive”, should it be “safe”?
>>3118660 same question

Hello, someone says this is grimdark but I don’t think this is nightmare including, its pretty mild graphically. The topic is Derpy and someone too much likes Derpy, triggers for dark scenes with Derpy. I dont think its abuse, because the main topic is a Derpy soldier that is attacked by Tirek and I dont think its grotesque, there is a little blood but really mild. Just because its not that horror gore or nightmare including. I need a moderator if any changes needed in tagging, because the Derpy defenders will trigger if I do any changes.
>>3120005

@Brokedownandmadeone
Barely (it’s a lot of weird blood smears when it’s trying to imply things cut off), but yes.

@Background Pony #4230
Thanks, will reply further in that thread

>>2824755
Shouldn’t this be grimdark?

@Jonny Manz
This was discussed recently in the General Tag Discussion thread; this post and the two replies immediately following it

I don’t know if this belongs here (and if it doesn’t, I would be most appreciative of being redirected to the proper venue), but I had a question about the combination tags, e.g. “duo female”. Are those like the “solo female” and “solo male” tags where they are only to be used on suggestive-and-above images, or are they fine to be used on safe images? I interpreted the tag guidelines as the former, but I noticed a lot of people do the latter.

Either way, perhaps it could be given a little clarification on the tag guideline page, like “this applies also to tags such as ‘duo female’, etc.” or “this does not apply to any other dual tags, such as ‘duo female’, etc.” so that people (such as myself) are not confused by it.

@JP
Safe is probably fine here, it’s maybe a little borderline, but it’s just a look and hoof placement.

@Background Pony #B065
Generally boob smothering is Suggestive.

Ratings check:
>>3117633
Was safe, keeps getting retagged as suggestive, I’m not sure that’s correct.