How is that unique to this? Dragons look different in every Gen they appear in, especially when one keeps in mind the “Spike” of each Generation usually looks totally different than the dragons around them (up to and including G5’s “Spike”
Sparky).
I don’t even really see how it’d be useful just for body-type categorization; Unlike the G1 to G4 Seaponies, or the G1 to G5 Troggles, Dragons are not a species MLP invented. There were hundreds or thousands of quadrupedal dragons on-site before hand (including ones in other Generations), and it feels rather arbitrary to only tag the ones that show up in G5 as this unique thing, as if there’s every other dragon on the site both canon and fanmade
and dragon (g5)
. But even if you were, quadrupedal dragon
or something like it to apply to all four-legged dragons makes much more sense.
It wouldn’t even be consistent within itself: Sparky, the first and most commonly appearing dragon in G5, has the exact same body-type as G4 young Spike.
If we have tags for adult Spike and winged Spike, then I see no reason to not have a tag for G5 dragons.
Those aren’t even the same types of tags. A more appropriate comparison to something like
winged spike
would be
spike (g5), a tag concept I’m totally okay with for that reason (although I would like it to have a more descriptive and distinguishable tag name).