>>2681667
I made an Other report before on this image, stating the following:
Unsure if this should be tagged with questionable
because of the obvious fetish content, or left suggestive
due to lack of genitals. rating tag guidelines doesn’t cover non-nude/non-genital fetish content except in point 2 of questionable. Maybe needs a post in forums?
Fart fetish content isn’t covered either in visual or audio form. Two “close, but no cigar” points in guidelines are
suggestive
–Visible urination
questionable
–Bodily fluids or waste in sensual contact with the body (such as watersports, scat, or messy diapers)
I’d figure it’d fall under questionable
much more often than not, because it would line up with a fetishized “waste” bodily function, but not in more joke-like scenarios. Maybe this?
questionable
–Fart content, when it’s the focus of the media and/or when it’s involved in a sensual manner (like deriving pleasure from smelling or relieving themselves, or EFRO [Erotic Female Relieving Observerance; A very common fetish involving watching women fart, pee and poop, yet not in a hardcore/scat way.])
I can’t currently come up with other or better examples for the parentheses in a way to explain better the “focus” aspect without being redundant. Tried to somewhat match it up with the existing questionable point.