I know that’s a hard concept for a partisan to understand, but it’s true.
I’m also a capitalist and work in corporate consulting. But I also support sustainability, green energy, unions, and fair pay.
You can be nuanced. You don’t have to be easy to label.
…Although, I definitely cannot say the same in any regard of you potentially being an exception to the stereotype of a liberal openly assuming that at least one person or some number of any random people who disagree with or questions you (the latter of which I did) is an uneducated and/or non-intellectual partisan hack, ignorant fellow, or worse—at least, in regards to how you responded to me, that is.
Given how you specifically go after some people in this thread while leaving others (like silbasa) alone, it’s hard not to mistake you for one.
@Background Pony #39BF
What’s “nothing but absolutely unmitigated bullshit” is ignoring that the US carbon emissions may be half of China’s, but they only have a fourth of the population, meaning that the carbon footprint of the average American is still twice a Chinese’s (and let’s not talk about India when their own carbon emissions are half of the US’s, making an Indian’s carbon footprint a whooping eighth of an American’s).
Are you just going off by simple math-use alone, or by using citations of actual sources?
Here are some
2018 figures for the top carbon emitters. Populations figures are even easier to look up. From there, doing the math ought to be child’s play. And as
AaronMk pointed out, that’s not even taking in account the intranational discrepancies pertaining to the income level.
(and given how the content of your “replies” never amounts to anything other than “you’re wrong” or “you’re dumb”, the spam and wasted space is even more annoying)
…Art thy holiness now royally satisfied with thine fulfillment of thy divine bidding? 😒
There, was that so hard? I swear, it’s like you’ve been asked to pull your own teeth. Now if only #39BF could do the same…